by Steven Hassan
There are "cults", but whose to say whether the Catholic Church, the Jewish religion, or the Baptists are more of a "cult" than the Moonies, the Hare Krishnas, or Scientology. It seems that what primarily defines a "cult" is that it is smaller than the others, non-traditional and threatens the established larger, organized "cults". Still, Hassan does shed light on the nature of mind control, but one needs to keep in mind that the mechanics of "mind control" is probably just as common with modern accepted traditional belief systems as with any of the so-called "cults". Psychologists and psychiatrists are the main creators and instigators of "mind control". The CIA was directly involved in the Jonestown incident involving the People's Temple and Jim Jones. Apparently the CIA created and nurtured a cult to experiment with psychological theories about group control, and to ascertain just what they could get people to do in the name of "religion" and "belief" (including suicide and murder). There is evidence that various Satanic "cults", ritual murder, and off-the-wall occult practices are also in some cases similar experiments in "mind control" conducted by government agencies. Psychiatrists and psychologists on the payroll of the government secretly conduct human experimentation so they can figure out just what people can be "tricked" into believing and doing. One should therefore read anything by them which claims to understand and "solve" cults and "mind control" with a suspicious eye, since, in fact, they are the primary cause of many of these things. The "Cult Awareness Network" (CAN), using "modern" psychological theories about "cults" routinely abducted, coerced and even tortured family members in an attempt to "break" them from their beliefs which the rest of the family members didn't like or agree with. The FBI and BATF based their decisions at Waco, Texas with David Koresh and the Branch Davidians on suggestions from the CAN resulting in a complete catastrophe. For the most part they don't know what they are talking about. Read this book with that in mind. Reviews
gordon_neufeld@hotmail.com
from Calgary, Alberta, July 9, 1999
pmosier@idirect.com from
Toronto, Ontario, Canada, December 11, 1997
An excellent examination of the cult phenomena. Described as "The #1 Best-selling Guide to Protection, Rescue, and Recovery from Destructive Cults," Haassan's book explains what elements are common to cults, and what defines a cult. As a former member of the the Unification Church (a.k.a. "Moonies") and a psychologist (he obtained his degree after exiting the Moonies), Hassan offers a unique perspective and insight into the cult movement. Although peppered with examples and anecdotes from the Moonies, Hassan is careful to keep the analysis general enough to apply to many other "questionable" groups and organizations. When is a cult not a cult? Does a group have to be "religious" to be a cult, or could a "non-religious" cult exist? Hassan answers these questions and more, and clearly defines the difference between unusual beliefs (which do not necessarily identify a group as a cult) and dangerous & destructive social factors (which, independent of the beliefs, make a group a cult, according to Hassan's definition). Strongly recommended for anyone who has friends or family in an "unusual" group; this book will help you to either dismiss your fears of cult involvement, or give you the advice you need to deal with this difficult situation. Even more strongly recommended for anyone who feels they are an a group that has been "mislabeled" by society as a cult. This book will either help you to understand what defines a cult (so you can defend yourself against criticism) or else give you an interesting perspective on how others view your organization. A reader, May 8, 1997
|